SUMIT vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/26366/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010776282026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36185/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26366/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMIT

    Adv. ANSHUMAAN DALAL

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Sumit in a case involving charges under BNS sections for voluntarily causing injuries to a victim. While the court found a prima facie case against him, it held that his three-year pre-trial custody combined with completed investigation and lengthy pending trial made continued detention unjustified, applying the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is an exception." Sumit was ordered released on personal and surety bonds, with the court clarifying this decision does not prejudge the trial's outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26366/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Sumit in a case involving charges under BNS sections for voluntarily causing injuries to a victim. While the court found a prima facie case against him, it held that his three-year pre-trial custody combined with completed investigation and lengthy pending trial made continued detention unjustified, applying the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is an exception." Sumit was ordered released on personal and surety bonds, with the court clarifying this decision does not prejudge the trial's outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case