RAJ SINGH ALIAS RAJU vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. — CRR/394/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Feb-2018

CNR: PHHC010775982018

Filing Number

CRR/394/2018

Filing Date

30-Jan-2018

Registration No

CRR/394/2018

Registration Date

30-Jan-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Bench Type

Single

Category

37.6 - PROCEEDINGS STAYED IN CRIMINAL REVISION ( 196 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ SINGH ALIAS RAJU

    Adv. VIKRAM SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    In CRR 394/2018, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Raj Singh's petition as infructuous after the Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat acquitted him on 23.01.2026 of charges under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in FIR No.118 (2016). Since the petitioner's acquittal rendered the revision petition moot, the court dismissed it accordingly with all pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Sep-2018

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal

  4. 19-Sep-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

  5. 23-Jul-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

  6. 19-Apr-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

  7. 02-Feb-2018

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal

  8. 02-Feb-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 30-Jan-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/394/2018

casestatus.in Summary

In CRR 394/2018, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Raj Singh's petition as infructuous after the Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat acquitted him on 23.01.2026 of charges under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in FIR No.118 (2016). Since the petitioner's acquittal rendered the revision petition moot, the court dismissed it accordingly with all pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case