DHARAMBEER SINGH DAGAR @ DHARAMBIR SINGH AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR — CRM-M/26273/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010775962026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36129/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26273/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Category

38.1 - QUASHING PETITIONS I/O ( 152 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARAMBEER SINGH DAGAR @ DHARAMBIR SINGH AND ANR

    Adv. SURENDER DHULL

  2. 2.DHARAMBEER SINGH

  3. 3.MANGE RAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

  2. 2.DHARAMBEER SINGH

  3. 3.MANGE RAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/26273/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.003 (registered under Section 174-A IPC for absconding) against Dharambeer Singh Dagar. The FIR was registered after the petitioner was declared a proclaimed person in a cheque dishonor case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, since the underlying complaint was subsequently withdrawn following an amicable settlement between the parties, the court found that continuing the FIR proceedings constituted abuse of process and allowed the petition with costs of Rs.20,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26273/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/26273/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.003 (registered under Section 174-A IPC for absconding) against Dharambeer Singh Dagar. The FIR was registered after the petitioner was declared a proclaimed person in a cheque dishonor case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, since the underlying complaint was subsequently withdrawn following an amicable settlement between the parties, the court found that continuing the FIR proceedings constituted abuse of process and allowed the petition with costs of Rs.20,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case