GULAB SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/26093/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010774542026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36083/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26093/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULAB SINGH

    Adv. SANJIV SHEORAN

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-26093-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Gulab Singh in an NDPS Act case where he was implicated solely based on a co-accused's disclosure statement regarding 4.527 kg of charas, with no direct recovery from the petitioner. The court held that disclosure statements without corroborative evidence have limited evidentiary value and cannot be the sole basis for implicating an accused, while noting that the petitioner's 9+ months of incarceration without trial progression and absence of evidence linking him to the contraband warranted bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26093/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-26093-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Gulab Singh in an NDPS Act case where he was implicated solely based on a co-accused's disclosure statement regarding 4.527 kg of charas, with no direct recovery from the petitioner. The court held that disclosure statements without corroborative evidence have limited evidentiary value and cannot be the sole basis for implicating an accused, while noting that the petitioner's 9+ months of incarceration without trial progression and absence of evidence linking him to the contraband warranted bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case