JAGDISH KAUR KUNDI vs BANK OF BARODA AND OTHERS — CWP/14357/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010774052026

e-Filing Number

05-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/27986/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14357/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISH KAUR KUNDI

    Adv. ANURADHA GUPTA

  2. 2.BANK OF BARODA AND OTHERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BANK OF BARODA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.BANK OF BARODA AND OTHERS

  3. 3.PRESIDING OFFICER

  4. 4.PRESIDING OFFICER

  5. 5.MS VIKAS ENTERPRISES

  6. 6.SH RAJ GILL

  7. 7.SMT RAJINDER KAUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14357/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chandigarh to expeditiously decide Jagdish Kaur Kundi's pending restoration application (MA No.43 of 2022) within four months, finding it had been repeatedly adjourned despite four years of pendency. However, the court rejected her prayer to direct Bank of Baroda to remove her from the guarantors' array, holding that her claim of never being a guarantor must be raised before the DRT itself once the ex parte order is set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14357/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14357/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chandigarh to expeditiously decide Jagdish Kaur Kundi's pending restoration application (MA No.43 of 2022) within four months, finding it had been repeatedly adjourned despite four years of pendency. However, the court rejected her prayer to direct Bank of Baroda to remove her from the guarantors' array, holding that her claim of never being a guarantor must be raised before the DRT itself once the ex parte order is set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case