NAVNATH TANAJI MISAL ALIAS ROTAN vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/26227/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010771622026

Filing Number

CRM-M/35933/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26227/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.1 - QUASHING PETITIONS I/O ( 152 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAVNATH TANAJI MISAL ALIAS ROTAN

    Adv. ABHISHEK KHULLAR

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-26227/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed petitioner Navnath Tanaji Misal's petition seeking to quash FIR No. 24 for alleged theft of 500 grams of gold and receiving stolen property. Though the petitioner was not originally named in the FIR, investigation revealed he purchased 300 grams of stolen gold from another accused, leading to his arrest and recovery of approximately 1717 grams of gold-silver mixture from his possession. The court held that sufficient prima facie material existed to proceed to trial and that issues regarding evidence admissibility, identification of recovered articles, and false implication are matters for the trial court, not for quashing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26227/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-26227/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed petitioner Navnath Tanaji Misal's petition seeking to quash FIR No. 24 for alleged theft of 500 grams of gold and receiving stolen property. Though the petitioner was not originally named in the FIR, investigation revealed he purchased 300 grams of stolen gold from another accused, leading to his arrest and recovery of approximately 1717 grams of gold-silver mixture from his possession. The court held that sufficient prima facie material existed to proceed to trial and that issues regarding evidence admissibility, identification of recovered articles, and false implication are matters for the trial court, not for quashing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case