MUNESH KUMAR @ MANISH KUMAR @ MONI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/26191/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010771162026
Filing Number
CRM-M/35923/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/26191/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Coram
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUNESH KUMAR @ MANISH KUMAR @ MONI
Adv. DAVNEET SANGWAN
-
2.MUNESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA
-
2.MUNESH KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M-26191-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to petitioner Munesh Kumar in an NDPS case where 2400 Tramadol capsules were recovered from co-accused. The court held that since only co-accused disclosure statements implicated the petitioner (with no direct evidence or recovery from him), and co-accused statements are inadmissible against other accused under established Supreme Court precedent, bail was warranted despite the "commercial quantity" of drugs involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/26191/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M-26191-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to petitioner Munesh Kumar in an NDPS case where 2400 Tramadol capsules were recovered from co-accused. The court held that since only co-accused disclosure statements implicated the petitioner (with no direct evidence or recovery from him), and co-accused statements are inadmissible against other accused under established Supreme Court precedent, bail was warranted despite the "commercial quantity" of drugs involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts