JASWANT SINGH AND ANOTHER vs IQBAL SINGH ALIAS BALI AND OTHERS — CR/4014/2026
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010770882026
Filing Number
CR/27814/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
CR/4014/2026
Registration Date
11-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal
Coram
Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal
Category
30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JASWANT SINGH AND ANOTHER
Adv. ABHISHEK BHARDWAJ
-
2.JASWANT SINGH
-
3.SWARJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.IQBAL SINGH ALIAS BALI AND OTHERS
-
2.JASWANT SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Vikram AggarwalView PDF
Case Summary: CR/4014/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of the plaintiffs' application to amend their plaint. The plaintiffs sought to add allegations challenging an unregistered Will dated 04.04.2018 executed by Devi Singh in favor of defendant Iqbal Singh, claiming it was procured through fraud and misrepresentation. Justice Vikram Aggarwal held that the amendment could not be permitted at the late stage of trial after evidence had concluded, as it would effectively restart the proceedings de novo. The court found the plaintiffs' apprehension about future litigation unfounded and noted they had already filed a separate application in defendant's related suit under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to challenge the Will's validity, making the amendment unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR/4014/2026
Case Summary: CR/4014/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of the plaintiffs' application to amend their plaint. The plaintiffs sought to add allegations challenging an unregistered Will dated 04.04.2018 executed by Devi Singh in favor of defendant Iqbal Singh, claiming it was procured through fraud and misrepresentation. Justice Vikram Aggarwal held that the amendment could not be permitted at the late stage of trial after evidence had concluded, as it would effectively restart the proceedings de novo. The court found the plaintiffs' apprehension about future litigation unfounded and noted they had already filed a separate application in defendant's related suit under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to challenge the Will's validity, making the amendment unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts