VEDPARKASH MITTAL vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS DEFENCE SECRETARY — CWP-PIL/128/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14, 16, 19(1)(g). Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010770642026
e-Filing Number
04-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP-PIL/27819/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
CWP-PIL/128/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry
Coram
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VEDPARKASH MITTAL
Adv. Gursimran Singh Jossan
-
2.Union of India through its Defence Secretary
-
3.Rohit Bhagat
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS DEFENCE SECRETARY
-
2.Union of India through its Defence Secretary
-
3.Rohit Bhagat
-
4.Principal Director, Defence Estates
-
5.Cantonment Board, Ferozepur Cantt through Estate Officer cum Chief Executive officer
-
6.Sub Divisional Engineer Cantonment Board Ferozepur Cantt
-
7.Manjit Singh
-
8.Harpreet Singh
-
9.Gajjinder Aggarwal
-
10.Usha Bhandari
-
11.Amit Bhandari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
The Chief Justice,mr. Justice Sanjiv BerryView PDF
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the petition by directing the competent authority to decide the petitioners' representation regarding unauthorized occupants on Cantonment Board land within 30 days, in accordance with law. The court declined to comment on case merits, accepting the petitioners' limited prayer for time-bound consideration of their grievance by the Chief Executive Officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP-PIL/128/2026
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the petition by directing the competent authority to decide the petitioners' representation regarding unauthorized occupants on Cantonment Board land within 30 days, in accordance with law. The court declined to comment on case merits, accepting the petitioners' limited prayer for time-bound consideration of their grievance by the Chief Executive Officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts