GURPREET SINGH ALIAS GOPI vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/26046/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010769972026

Filing Number

CRM-M/35885/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26046/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURPREET SINGH ALIAS GOPI

    Adv. KARANDEEP S. SIDHU

  2. 2.GURPREET SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.GURPREET SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Gurpreet Singh @ Gopi on May 13, 2026, in a case involving an alleged shooting incident. The Court found that the petitioner was implicated based solely on an alleged extra-judicial confession to his uncle (PW-1), who subsequently did not support the prosecution, and the complainant failed to identify him. Considering the petitioner's over one year incarceration, clean criminal record, and that key witnesses had already been examined, the Court determined bail was warranted, while declining to comment on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26046/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Gurpreet Singh @ Gopi on May 13, 2026, in a case involving an alleged shooting incident. The Court found that the petitioner was implicated based solely on an alleged extra-judicial confession to his uncle (PW-1), who subsequently did not support the prosecution, and the complainant failed to identify him. Considering the petitioner's over one year incarceration, clean criminal record, and that key witnesses had already been examined, the Court determined bail was warranted, while declining to comment on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case