SONIA GAUR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14433/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010769122026

e-Filing Number

04-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/27728/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14433/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Coram

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Category

58.8 - SERVICE-EDU-HARYANA(SECONDARY) RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 731 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONIA GAUR

    Adv. P.S. KHURANA

  2. 2.Sonia Gaur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Sonia Gaur

  3. 3.Directorate of school education

  4. 4.District Education Officer

  5. 5.Principal Govt Sr Sec School

  6. 6.Principal Accountant General

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Tribhuvan DahiyaView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed Sonia Gaur's petition seeking family pension as a divorced daughter of a deceased Drawing Teacher. The court permitted her to file a fresh representation before the Director of School Education, with all relevant documents establishing her dependency, to be decided within three months. If the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the concerned officer must pay ₹50,000 as costs to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14433/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed Sonia Gaur's petition seeking family pension as a divorced daughter of a deceased Drawing Teacher. The court permitted her to file a fresh representation before the Director of School Education, with all relevant documents establishing her dependency, to be decided within three months. If the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the concerned officer must pay ₹50,000 as costs to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case