BALDEV KUMAR vs DHAN SINGH — CRM-M/26855/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010768942026

Filing Number

CRM-M/35853/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26855/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Category

38.29 - QUASHING PET U/S 482 CRPC GEN IN U/S 138 NI ACT ( 649 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALDEV KUMAR

    Adv. RAJAT SHEOKAND

  2. 2.DHAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHAN SINGH

  2. 2.DHAN SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-26855-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the trial court's bail cancellation order dated 08.04.2026 in a Section 138 NI Act case, accepting petitioner Baldev Kumar's claim that his non-appearance was due to medical reasons beyond his control. The court directed Kumar to deposit ₹25,000 costs within seven days and appear before the trial court within ten days to seek fresh bail, with ten days' protection from arrest. The court did not verify the authenticity of Kumar's medical grounds but permitted him to rejoin proceedings given his willingness to face trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26855/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-26855-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the trial court's bail cancellation order dated 08.04.2026 in a Section 138 NI Act case, accepting petitioner Baldev Kumar's claim that his non-appearance was due to medical reasons beyond his control. The court directed Kumar to deposit ₹25,000 costs within seven days and appear before the trial court within ten days to seek fresh bail, with ten days' protection from arrest. The court did not verify the authenticity of Kumar's medical grounds but permitted him to rejoin proceedings given his willingness to face trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case