ASHU SHARMA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/26188/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010767802026

Filing Number

CRM-M/35778/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26188/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHU SHARMA

    Adv. AYUSHKA SHARMA

  2. 2.ASHU SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.ASHU SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-26188-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Ashu Sharma's bail petition in a murder case (FIR No. 454/2024, Hisar) involving alleged contract-killing charges under Sections 103(1), 3(5), and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Although no eyewitness identified the petitioner, the court found prima facie evidence including CCTV footage showing him tracking the deceased with co-accused, and evidence that he received and sold the victim's gold ornaments, establishing a strong link to the crime. The court rejected bail, citing ongoing trial at initial stage with material witnesses yet to be examined, creating risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26188/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-26188-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Ashu Sharma's bail petition in a murder case (FIR No. 454/2024, Hisar) involving alleged contract-killing charges under Sections 103(1), 3(5), and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Although no eyewitness identified the petitioner, the court found prima facie evidence including CCTV footage showing him tracking the deceased with co-accused, and evidence that he received and sold the victim's gold ornaments, establishing a strong link to the crime. The court rejected bail, citing ongoing trial at initial stage with material witnesses yet to be examined, creating risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case