BALBIR SINGH ALIAS GOGA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/25889/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010766612026

Filing Number

CRM-M/35698/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25889/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALBIR SINGH ALIAS GOGA

    Adv. Chandan Singh Rana

  2. 2.BALBIR SINGH@GOGA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.BALBIR SINGH@GOGA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Balvir Singh @Goga, who had been in custody for over three years in connection with a violent assault case (FIR involving charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 148, 149, 120-B, 326, and 307). The court found that the prolonged detention was unjustified given: (i) investigation completion; (ii) petitioner's clean record; (iii) slow trial progress (only 8 of 18 witnesses examined); (iv) no evidence of tampering or witness intimidation risks; and (v) the constitutional right to speedy trial. Bail was granted with conditions including furnishing bonds, maintaining court-notified address, and obtaining permission before leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25889/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Balvir Singh @Goga, who had been in custody for over three years in connection with a violent assault case (FIR involving charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 148, 149, 120-B, 326, and 307). The court found that the prolonged detention was unjustified given: (i) investigation completion; (ii) petitioner's clean record; (iii) slow trial progress (only 8 of 18 witnesses examined); (iv) no evidence of tampering or witness intimidation risks; and (v) the constitutional right to speedy trial. Bail was granted with conditions including furnishing bonds, maintaining court-notified address, and obtaining permission before leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case