SAMRATDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/25947/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010766472026

Filing Number

CRM-M/35649/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25947/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMRATDEEP SINGH

    Adv. SARBJIT SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/25947/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to petitioner Samratdeep Singh in a drug possession case, finding that eight months of custody without direct evidence against him—only a co-accused's disputed disclosure statement and a small quantity of heroin (9 grams) recovered from another person—violated his rights to speedy trial and presumption of innocence. The court emphasized that bail is the rule, not the exception, and that continued detention served no purpose given weak evidence and prolonged trial delays. Key Conditions: Release on personal and surety bonds with restrictions against witness tampering, notification of address changes, and prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25947/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/25947/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to petitioner Samratdeep Singh in a drug possession case, finding that eight months of custody without direct evidence against him—only a co-accused's disputed disclosure statement and a small quantity of heroin (9 grams) recovered from another person—violated his rights to speedy trial and presumption of innocence. The court emphasized that bail is the rule, not the exception, and that continued detention served no purpose given weak evidence and prolonged trial delays. Key Conditions: Release on personal and surety bonds with restrictions against witness tampering, notification of address changes, and prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case