HITESH KUMAR vs ASHA AGGARWAL AND ORS. — CR/3952/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010765812026

Filing Number

CR/27636/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CR/3952/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Coram

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HITESH KUMAR

    Adv. ASHISH KAUSHIK

  2. 2.HITESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHA AGGARWAL AND ORS.

  2. 2.HITESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Parmod GoyalView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Hitesh Kumar's revision petition challenging the lower court's rejection of his application to dismiss the plaint filed by Asha Aggarwal. The court upheld that the plaintiffs adequately disclosed their cause of action—seeking permanent injunction to prevent petrol pump installation violating 300-meter spacing guidelines—and that the suit was not barred by Petroleum Rules 2002 (Rules 149, 150, 154), which provide remedies only to applicants denied no-objection certificates, not third-party opponents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/3952/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Hitesh Kumar's revision petition challenging the lower court's rejection of his application to dismiss the plaint filed by Asha Aggarwal. The court upheld that the plaintiffs adequately disclosed their cause of action—seeking permanent injunction to prevent petrol pump installation violating 300-meter spacing guidelines—and that the suit was not barred by Petroleum Rules 2002 (Rules 149, 150, 154), which provide remedies only to applicants denied no-objection certificates, not third-party opponents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case