PARWANA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/25971/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010761832026
Filing Number
CRM-M/35428/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/25971/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel
Coram
Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARWANA
Adv. SIMI KANDRA
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M-25971-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Parwana in an NDPS case involving 255 grams of Tramadol Hydrochloride—marginally above the non-commercial quantity threshold. Justice Sumeet Goel found that prolonged detention was unwarranted given the long trial timeline (23 witnesses not yet examined), absence of flight risk, and that Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions are diluted under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court imposed strict conditions including monthly affidavits, passport deposit, and restrictions against evidence tampering and trial delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/25971/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M-25971-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Parwana in an NDPS case involving 255 grams of Tramadol Hydrochloride—marginally above the non-commercial quantity threshold. Justice Sumeet Goel found that prolonged detention was unwarranted given the long trial timeline (23 witnesses not yet examined), absence of flight risk, and that Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions are diluted under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court imposed strict conditions including monthly affidavits, passport deposit, and restrictions against evidence tampering and trial delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts