FATEH SINGH vs WAZIR SINGH AND OTHERS — CR/3925/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010760972026

Filing Number

CR/27494/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CR/3925/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Coram

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FATEH SINGH

    Adv. BALJINDER SINGH VIRK

  2. 2.WAZIR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WAZIR SINGH AND OTHERS

  2. 2.WAZIR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Parmod GoyalView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/3925/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Fateh Singh's revision petition challenging the lower court's dismissal of his application to set aside ex parte proceedings from February 15, 2019. Singh was duly served but failed to appear, claiming he had relied on family members (defendants 14-18) to represent him—however, he provided no authorization document. The court found his explanation inadequate, noting the six-year delay in filing the application and the lack of cogent evidence, and held that his attempt appeared designed to delay trial proceedings rather than seek genuine relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/3925/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/3925/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Fateh Singh's revision petition challenging the lower court's dismissal of his application to set aside ex parte proceedings from February 15, 2019. Singh was duly served but failed to appear, claiming he had relied on family members (defendants 14-18) to represent him—however, he provided no authorization document. The court found his explanation inadequate, noting the six-year delay in filing the application and the lack of cogent evidence, and held that his attempt appeared designed to delay trial proceedings rather than seek genuine relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case