NEERAJ VERMA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/25429/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010758482026

Filing Number

CRM-M/35232/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25429/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEERAJ VERMA

    Adv. RANDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.NEERAJ VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.NEERAJ VERMA

  3. 3.CHANDGI RAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/25429/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Neeraj Verma, who was arrested for allegedly defrauding a complainant of Rs. 12,02,500 in a fake study visa scheme. Although the allegations constitute a prima facie case under IPC sections 406, 420, 506, 465, 468, and 471, the court ordered his release on personal/surety bonds, considering his four-month custody period, completed investigation, pending FIR quashing petition based on compromise, and that the magistrate-triable offences would not warrant further pre-trial detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25429/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/25429/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Neeraj Verma, who was arrested for allegedly defrauding a complainant of Rs. 12,02,500 in a fake study visa scheme. Although the allegations constitute a prima facie case under IPC sections 406, 420, 506, 465, 468, and 471, the court ordered his release on personal/surety bonds, considering his four-month custody period, completed investigation, pending FIR quashing petition based on compromise, and that the magistrate-triable offences would not warrant further pre-trial detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case