GMADA THR ESTATE OFFICER vs SWARAN SINGH KAHLON AND ANR — RFA/592/2024

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010758402024

Filing Number

RFA/31448/2024

Filing Date

29-May-2024

Registration No

RFA/592/2024

Registration Date

29-Jun-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Coram

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

25.3 - RFA (LAND ACQUISITION) PUNJAB ( 493 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL-I(RFA) BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GMADA THR ESTATE OFFICER

    Adv. RAKESH GUPTA

  2. 2.SWARAN SINGH KAHLON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SWARAN SINGH KAHLON AND ANR

  2. 2.SWARAN SINGH KAHLON

  3. 3.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF

    Summary of RFA 592/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed GMADA's appeal and partly allowed landowners' cross-objections in a land acquisition dispute. The court fixed compensation at Rs.3,89,16,000/- per acre (based on Rs.3,38,40,000/- from a prior related acquisition plus 12% annual appreciation for the 15-month gap between two acquisition notifications), rejecting GMADA's argument that lower-value sale deeds should override previous court awards for identical revenue estates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/592/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of RFA 592/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed GMADA's appeal and partly allowed landowners' cross-objections in a land acquisition dispute. The court fixed compensation at Rs.3,89,16,000/- per acre (based on Rs.3,38,40,000/- from a prior related acquisition plus 12% annual appreciation for the 15-month gap between two acquisition notifications), rejecting GMADA's argument that lower-value sale deeds should override previous court awards for identical revenue estates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case