BRIJESH ALIAS TONI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/25612/2026
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010756292026
Filing Number
CRM-M/35107/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/25612/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Ms. Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal
Coram
Ms. Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.18 - REGULAR BAIL HARYANA (AGNST WOMEN) ( 287 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRIJESH ALIAS TONI
Adv. VISHAL GARG NARWANA
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Ms. Justice Shalini Singh NagpalView PDF
The High Court dismissed Brijesh's regular bail petition in a dowry death case where his wife Annu died by suicide in February 2025, two years after marriage. The court found the allegations grave—that the petitioner and family members harassed her for inadequate dowry—and rejected his arguments that she was happy, there was no suicide note, and her mother pressured her to leave. Applying Supreme Court precedent emphasizing strict scrutiny in dowry death cases to protect gender equality and public confidence in justice, the court denied bail citing the serious nature of accusations, potential punishment, and pending prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/25612/2026
The High Court dismissed Brijesh's regular bail petition in a dowry death case where his wife Annu died by suicide in February 2025, two years after marriage. The court found the allegations grave—that the petitioner and family members harassed her for inadequate dowry—and rejected his arguments that she was happy, there was no suicide note, and her mother pressured her to leave. Applying Supreme Court precedent emphasizing strict scrutiny in dowry death cases to protect gender equality and public confidence in justice, the court denied bail citing the serious nature of accusations, potential punishment, and pending prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts