MS CIS BUREAUS FACILITY SERVICES vs PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, SAS NAGAR MOHALI — CWP/14529/2026

Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section ARTICLE 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010755992026

e-Filing Number

03-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/27313/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14529/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Coram

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Category

18.5 - LABOUR ( 452 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act Section ARTICLE 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS CIS BUREAUS FACILITY SERVICES

    Adv. GURSHABAD SINGH SANDHU

  2. 2.MS CIS Bureaus Facility Services

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, SAS NAGAR MOHALI

  2. 2.MS CIS Bureaus Facility Services

  3. 3.Harinder Singh

  4. 4.BVC Logistic

  5. 5.Armapro Security Services

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed CIS Bureaus Facility Services' writ petition challenging an ex parte labour tribunal award dated January 7, 2025. The court rejected the management's excuses for non-appearance—including pandemic-related tracking issues and office relocation—finding that the company had authorized representation, was properly served, and deliberately chose not to appear. The court upheld the tribunal's award in favor of the workman, finding no ambiguity and holding that the petitioner's grounds for setting aside the award were wholly unmeritorious. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14529/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed CIS Bureaus Facility Services' writ petition challenging an ex parte labour tribunal award dated January 7, 2025. The court rejected the management's excuses for non-appearance—including pandemic-related tracking issues and office relocation—finding that the company had authorized representation, was properly served, and deliberately chose not to appear. The court upheld the tribunal's award in favor of the workman, finding no ambiguity and holding that the petitioner's grounds for setting aside the award were wholly unmeritorious. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case