HARJIT SINGH ALIAS HARRY vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/25362/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010755662026

Filing Number

CRM-M/35029/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25362/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARJIT SINGH ALIAS HARRY

    Adv. GURMEET SINGH SAINI

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-25362-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Harjit Singh alias Harry in a extortion case (FIR No.0043 under Sections 308(4) and 351(2) BNS, 2023) registered at Police Station Makhu, Ferozepur. The petitioner was accused of making ransom calls demanding ₹50 lakhs. The court found arguable issues regarding the petitioner's involvement given an incomplete property transaction with the complainant (to whom ₹8.45 lakhs remained unpaid), the petitioner's clean antecedents, and that he was no longer needed for investigation after undergoing custody since February 21, 2026. The petitioner was ordered released on bail with conditions not to threaten or influence prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25362/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-25362-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Harjit Singh alias Harry in a extortion case (FIR No.0043 under Sections 308(4) and 351(2) BNS, 2023) registered at Police Station Makhu, Ferozepur. The petitioner was accused of making ransom calls demanding ₹50 lakhs. The court found arguable issues regarding the petitioner's involvement given an incomplete property transaction with the complainant (to whom ₹8.45 lakhs remained unpaid), the petitioner's clean antecedents, and that he was no longer needed for investigation after undergoing custody since February 21, 2026. The petitioner was ordered released on bail with conditions not to threaten or influence prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case