GURSEWAK SINGH @ BHANA & ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/25308/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010755342026

Filing Number

CRM-M/35006/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25308/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURSEWAK SINGH @ BHANA & ANOTHER

    Adv. YAJUR SHARMA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.SUNNY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/25308/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to two young men (aged 22 and 18) arrested under NDPS Act for possessing 9 grams and 2 grams of heroin respectively. Justice Subhas Mehla allowed the petition, citing that investigation was complete, the quantities fell under intermediate/small categories, neither accused was needed for investigation, and prolonged custody would negatively impact their futures. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception," ordering their release on furnishing requisite bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25308/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/25308/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to two young men (aged 22 and 18) arrested under NDPS Act for possessing 9 grams and 2 grams of heroin respectively. Justice Subhas Mehla allowed the petition, citing that investigation was complete, the quantities fell under intermediate/small categories, neither accused was needed for investigation, and prolonged custody would negatively impact their futures. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception," ordering their release on furnishing requisite bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case