DFO, BHIWANI vs RAJBIR AND ORS. — CWP/7864/2009
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010754972009
Filing Number
CWP/7864/2009
Filing Date
21-May-2009
Registration No
CWP/7864/2009
Registration Date
21-May-2009
Judge
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Coram
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Bench Type
Single
Category
18.5 - LABOUR ( 452 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DFO, BHIWANI
Adv. A.G. HARYANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJBIR AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana modified the arbitral award dated 28.01.2008 by mutual consensus between the parties: the workman (Rajbir) was granted reinstatement to his previous post with continuity of service, but without the 50% back wages originally awarded. The Court dismissed the workman's request for regularization as outside the scope of the writ petition, directing him to approach the concerned authorities separately for that relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2017
Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan
-
08-Apr-2017
—
Mr. Justice Girish Agnihotri
-
15-Nov-2010
—
Mr. Justice S.N. Aggarwal
-
27-Jul-2010
—
Mr. Justice S.N. Aggarwal
-
07-May-2010
—
Mr. Justice Jaspal Singh
-
21-Apr-2010
—
Mr. Justice Jaspal Singh
-
31-Mar-2010
—
Mr. Justice Jaspal Singh
-
16-Mar-2010
—
Mr. Justice Jaspal Singh
-
14-Dec-2009
—
Mr. Justice Harbans Singh Rai
-
21-Oct-2009
—
Mr. Justice Harbans Singh Rai
-
31-Aug-2009
—
Mr. Justice Harbans Singh Rai
-
23-Jul-2009
—
Mr. Justice Harbans Singh Rai
-
22-May-2009
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-May-2009
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/7864/2009
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana modified the arbitral award dated 28.01.2008 by mutual consensus between the parties: the workman (Rajbir) was granted reinstatement to his previous post with continuity of service, but without the 50% back wages originally awarded. The Court dismissed the workman's request for regularization as outside the scope of the writ petition, directing him to approach the concerned authorities separately for that relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts