JITENDER @ TUNA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRA-S/1609/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010754792026

Filing Number

CRA-S/34966/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CRA-S/1609/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

36.96-CRIMINAL APPEALS U/S 341 CR. P.C. (PERJURY)-CRIME AGAINST WOMEN ( 1427 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITENDER @ TUNA

    Adv. SANDEEP KUMAR YADAV

  2. 2.JITENDER@TUNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.JITENDER@TUNA

  3. 3.MAHENDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA-S/1609/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Jitender @ Tuna's bail appeal in a murder case (IPC §302 and SC/ST Act §3(2)(v)) arising from the death of Kirori, who died from injuries sustained during an alleged assault with an iron rod over a water dispute. The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's 22-month custody period, finding the case unsuitable for bail given the advanced trial stage (13 of 20 prosecution witnesses already examined) and the state's undertaking to complete remaining evidence within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-S/1609/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA-S/1609/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Jitender @ Tuna's bail appeal in a murder case (IPC §302 and SC/ST Act §3(2)(v)) arising from the death of Kirori, who died from injuries sustained during an alleged assault with an iron rod over a water dispute. The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's 22-month custody period, finding the case unsuitable for bail given the advanced trial stage (13 of 20 prosecution witnesses already examined) and the state's undertaking to complete remaining evidence within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case