AMAN GOYAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/5183/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010753892026

Filing Number

CRWP/34926/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CRWP/5183/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Category

42.1 - CRIMINAL WRIT (HABEAS CORPUS) ( 311 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMAN GOYAL

    Adv. VIKAS BALI

  2. 2.AMAN GOYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.AMAN GOYAL

  3. 3.DGP, PUNJAB POLICE HEADQUARTERS SECTOR 9, CHANDIGARH

  4. 4.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, LUDHIANA

  5. 5.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) SADAR, LUDHIANA

  6. 6.KULDEEP KUMAR BANSAL

  7. 7.VINAY GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Case Summary: CRWP/5183/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Aman Goyal's habeas corpus petition seeking his brother Rahul Goyal's release from police custody. A Warrant Officer's investigation revealed that Rahul Goyal was arrested without proper notice after additional criminal charges were added to an existing FIR, despite having been granted anticipatory bail in September 2025, and that his son's signatures were forcibly obtained on blank documents. The State conceded the arrest violated Supreme Court guidelines in *Pardeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand*, and a Judicial Magistrate subsequently ordered Rahul Goyal's release on May 4, 2026, rendering the petition moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/5183/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRWP/5183/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Aman Goyal's habeas corpus petition seeking his brother Rahul Goyal's release from police custody. A Warrant Officer's investigation revealed that Rahul Goyal was arrested without proper notice after additional criminal charges were added to an existing FIR, despite having been granted anticipatory bail in September 2025, and that his son's signatures were forcibly obtained on blank documents. The State conceded the arrest violated Supreme Court guidelines in *Pardeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand*, and a Judicial Magistrate subsequently ordered Rahul Goyal's release on May 4, 2026, rendering the petition moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case