TARSEM SINGH AND ANOTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/13886/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010753562026

e-Filing Number

02-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/27232/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/13886/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TARSEM SINGH AND ANOTHERS

    Adv. N.P.S. MANN

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

  3. 3.Jagandeep Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

  3. 3.Jagandeep Singh

  4. 4.HDFC Bank Ltd

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition after the petitioners demonstrated good faith by submitting a demand draft of Rs. 5 lakhs toward an outstanding debt exceeding Rs. 25 lakhs. The court directed the bank (respondent No. 3) to consider the petitioners' One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal if submitted within a fortnight, with the bank required to decide within one month of submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13886/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition after the petitioners demonstrated good faith by submitting a demand draft of Rs. 5 lakhs toward an outstanding debt exceeding Rs. 25 lakhs. The court directed the bank (respondent No. 3) to consider the petitioners' One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal if submitted within a fortnight, with the bank required to decide within one month of submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case