V.K. SINGH AND ANR vs SHREE NATH ENTERPRISES AND ANR — CRR/179/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

CNR: PHHC010753022018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

19th January 2018

Filing Number

CRR/179/2018

Filing Date

17-01-2018

Registration No

CRR/179/2018

Registration Date

18-01-2018

Judge

MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Coram

MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Bench Type

Single

Category

37.41 - CRR AGNST CONV ORDER U/S 138 OF NI ACT ( 621 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

V.K. SINGH AND ANR

Adv. NAVEEN SHARMA (BHARDWAJ)

Respondent(s)

SHREE NATH ENTERPRISES AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

19-01-2018
28-11-2018
29-08-2018
05-04-2018
27-03-2018

Orders

19-01-2018

MR. JUSTICE HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN

27-03-2018

MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL

29-08-2018

MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL

21-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside V.K. Singh's conviction and 2-year sentence for cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitting him after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The petitioner had paid the full compensation of Rs. 20,60,002 to the complainant by December 2024, and the Court exercised its inherent powers to compound the offense without imposing additional costs, citing the petitioner's prolonged litigation since 2011. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside V.K. Singh's conviction and 2-year sentence for cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitting him after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The petitioner had paid the full compensation of Rs. 20,60,002 to the complainant by December 2024, and the Court exercised its inherent powers to compound the offense without imposing additional costs, citing the petitioner's prolonged litigation since 2011. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case