V.K. SINGH AND ANR vs SHREE NATH ENTERPRISES AND ANR — CRR/179/2018
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010753022018
Filing Number
CRR/179/2018
Filing Date
17-Jan-2018
Registration No
CRR/179/2018
Registration Date
18-Jan-2018
Judge
Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel
Coram
Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel
Bench Type
Single
Category
37.41 - CRR AGNST CONV ORDER U/S 138 OF NI ACT ( 621 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.V.K. SINGH AND ANR
Adv. NAVEEN SHARMA (BHARDWAJ)
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHREE NATH ENTERPRISES AND ANR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside V.K. Singh's conviction and 2-year sentence for cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitting him after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The petitioner had paid the full compensation of Rs. 20,60,002 to the complainant by December 2024, and the Court exercised its inherent powers to compound the offense without imposing additional costs, citing the petitioner's prolonged litigation since 2011. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Nov-2018
—
Mr. Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia
-
29-Aug-2018
Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal
-
29-Aug-2018
—
Mr. Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia
-
05-Apr-2018
—
Mr. Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia
-
27-Mar-2018
Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal
-
27-Mar-2018
—
Mr. Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia
-
19-Jan-2018
Mr. Justice Harminder Singh Madaan
-
19-Jan-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2018
Case filed
Registration No. CRR/179/2018
Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside V.K. Singh's conviction and 2-year sentence for cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitting him after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The petitioner had paid the full compensation of Rs. 20,60,002 to the complainant by December 2024, and the Court exercised its inherent powers to compound the offense without imposing additional costs, citing the petitioner's prolonged litigation since 2011. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts