SHEELA DEVI AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — CRM-M/26294/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010752142026

Filing Number

CRM-M/34884/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26294/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Category

47 - CRIMINAL MISC.(DIRECTION) ( 215 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHEELA DEVI AND ANR

    Adv. NISCHAL CHETANYA MANCHANDA

  2. 2.SHEELA DEVI

  3. 3.SATISH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

  2. 2.SHEELA DEVI

  3. 3.SATISH KUMAR

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer) BUTANA

  5. 5.LEELA DEVI

  6. 6.MEENA

  7. 7.KAMLA

  8. 8.SEEMA

  9. 9.PARDEEP

  10. 10.SANJEEV@BILLU

  11. 11.MAHINDRO

  12. 12.JARASO

  13. 13.SULEKH

  14. 14.REKHA D

  15. 15.BIMLA

  16. 16.HAWA SINGH

  17. 17.RAJ KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M/26294/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Sheela Devi seeking directions to investigate a complaint dated 28.04.2026 against private respondents. The court found that the allegations in the property dispute were false, a DDR had already been recorded, and complaints were duly filed; therefore, no further directions were warranted. The petitioners were permitted to pursue alternative legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26294/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M/26294/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Sheela Devi seeking directions to investigate a complaint dated 28.04.2026 against private respondents. The court found that the allegations in the property dispute were false, a DDR had already been recorded, and complaints were duly filed; therefore, no further directions were warranted. The petitioners were permitted to pursue alternative legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case