PRINCE GILL vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/26040/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010751422026

Filing Number

CRM-M/34874/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26040/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRINCE GILL

    Adv. Sandeep Sharma

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-26040/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Prince Gill, who had been in custody since November 14, 2024 (approximately 1 year 5 months 26 days), in a cross-case involving charges under BNS Sections 109, 3(5), and Arms Act Sections 27, 54, 59 arising from an armed altercation at Uggi where one person died. Key Reasoning: Justice Sumeet Goel held that further detention was unwarranted because: (1) the trial will take considerable time with 29 prosecution witnesses cited but only one examined; (2) debatable issues regarding hostile witness testimony should be resolved during trial, not at bail stage; (3) no evidence showed likelihood of absconding or evidence tampering; and (4) prior criminal antecedents alone cannot deny bail when the specific FIR merits bail consideration. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including passport deposit, non-interference with evidence, and regular appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26040/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-26040/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Prince Gill, who had been in custody since November 14, 2024 (approximately 1 year 5 months 26 days), in a cross-case involving charges under BNS Sections 109, 3(5), and Arms Act Sections 27, 54, 59 arising from an armed altercation at Uggi where one person died. Key Reasoning: Justice Sumeet Goel held that further detention was unwarranted because: (1) the trial will take considerable time with 29 prosecution witnesses cited but only one examined; (2) debatable issues regarding hostile witness testimony should be resolved during trial, not at bail stage; (3) no evidence showed likelihood of absconding or evidence tampering; and (4) prior criminal antecedents alone cannot deny bail when the specific FIR merits bail consideration. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including passport deposit, non-interference with evidence, and regular appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case