LATIKA SINGLA vs STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS — CWP/13792/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010751222026

e-Filing Number

01-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/27100/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/13792/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

20.27 - SCOSB UOI ( 459 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LATIKA SINGLA

    Adv. DEEPAK PANGHAL

  2. 2.Latika Singla

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Latika Singla

  3. 3.SBI Life Insurance Company Limited

  4. 4.Regional Director, SBI Life Insurance Company Limited

  5. 5.Associate Vice President (Sales Training),

  6. 6.Regional HR / Competent Authority

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-13792-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed State Bank of India to decide Latika Singla's representation dated 25.03.2026 (challenging her performance appraisal rating of 2/5 for 2024-25) within eight weeks, after providing her a hearing and passing a reasoned order. The court disposed the petition without commenting on merits, requiring the bank to supply a copy of the order to the petitioner within one week thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13792/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-13792-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed State Bank of India to decide Latika Singla's representation dated 25.03.2026 (challenging her performance appraisal rating of 2/5 for 2024-25) within eight weeks, after providing her a hearing and passing a reasoned order. The court disposed the petition without commenting on merits, requiring the bank to supply a copy of the order to the petitioner within one week thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case