JAI PRAKASH @ LEELA RAM vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/25472/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010750442026

Filing Number

CRM-M/34833/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25472/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAI PRAKASH @ LEELA RAM

    Adv. GAGANDEEP KAUR

  2. 2.JAI PARKASH @ LEELA RAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.JAI PARKASH @ LEELA RAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Jai Parkash's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving serious charges of unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous injuries. The court found that although no specific injury was directly attributed to the petitioner, he was prima facie part of an armed unlawful assembly that forcibly entered the complainant's house and inflicted multiple grievous injuries (spine fractures, leg fractures, hand fractures) on the victim. Given the severity of injuries and allegations, the court deemed custodial interrogation necessary and rejected the bail plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25472/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Jai Parkash's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving serious charges of unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous injuries. The court found that although no specific injury was directly attributed to the petitioner, he was prima facie part of an armed unlawful assembly that forcibly entered the complainant's house and inflicted multiple grievous injuries (spine fractures, leg fractures, hand fractures) on the victim. Given the severity of injuries and allegations, the court deemed custodial interrogation necessary and rejected the bail plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case