SOOBA SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — CWP/13069/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010749112023
Filing Number
CWP/30388/2023
Filing Date
31-May-2023
Registration No
CWP/13069/2023
Registration Date
02-Jun-2023
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Bench Type
Double
Category
4.8 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ( 364 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOOBA SINGH
Adv. K.B. SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
-
2.CHIEF ENGINEER AIR FORCE PALAM
-
3.CHIEF ENGINEER HQ WESTERN COMMAND
-
4.GARRISON ENGINEER CHANDIGARH
-
5.ASSISTANT GARRISON ENGINEER
-
6.THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed petitioner Sooba Singh, an Air Force employee, to remain posted at GE (Chandigarh) until his retirement in July 2028, despite a 2022 transfer order to AGE (I) High Ground. Though acknowledging the employer's general right to transfer employees for administrative exigencies, the court made an exception based on Singh's exceptional circumstances—approximately two years remaining until retirement and prior compliance with an interim court order allowing him to work at Chandigarh—permitting him to continue there unless his conduct necessitates transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jul-2023
Other
-
31-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/13069/2023
Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed petitioner Sooba Singh, an Air Force employee, to remain posted at GE (Chandigarh) until his retirement in July 2028, despite a 2022 transfer order to AGE (I) High Ground. Though acknowledging the employer's general right to transfer employees for administrative exigencies, the court made an exception based on Singh's exceptional circumstances—approximately two years remaining until retirement and prior compliance with an interim court order allowing him to work at Chandigarh—permitting him to continue there unless his conduct necessitates transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts