DALJIT KAUR vs PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD AND ORS — CWP/15148/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section Article 226 and 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010748662026
e-Filing Number
01-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/26980/2026
Filing Date
01-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/15148/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
Coram
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
Category
20.5 - SC OSB (PUNJAB) RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 467 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DALJIT KAUR
Adv. SANDEEP BANSAL
-
2.Daljit Kaur
Respondent(s)
-
1.PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD AND ORS
-
2.Daljit Kaur
-
3.The Additional Superintending Engineer
-
4.The Officer In charge, Deputy Chief Accounts Officer
-
5.The Sub Divisional Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/15148/2026 Court Decision (15.05.2026): The Punjab High Court disposed of the petition without deciding merits, directing Punjab State Power Corporation to reconsider Daljit Kaur's family pension claim within three months by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law and relevant precedents. The court noted the respondent raised no objection to this direction. Key Facts: Daljit Kaur, second wife of a deceased PSPCL employee, was granted only 50% family pension via PPO dated 17.02.2014, despite her husband's first wife having died in 1998—before his marriage to the petitioner. Daljit Kaur contended she is the sole surviving spouse and entitled to 100% pension, supported by family consent and precedent judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/15148/2026
Case Summary: CWP/15148/2026 Court Decision (15.05.2026): The Punjab High Court disposed of the petition without deciding merits, directing Punjab State Power Corporation to reconsider Daljit Kaur's family pension claim within three months by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law and relevant precedents. The court noted the respondent raised no objection to this direction. Key Facts: Daljit Kaur, second wife of a deceased PSPCL employee, was granted only 50% family pension via PPO dated 17.02.2014, despite her husband's first wife having died in 1998—before his marriage to the petitioner. Daljit Kaur contended she is the sole surviving spouse and entitled to 100% pension, supported by family consent and precedent judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts