BALBIR AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — CWP/13671/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010747622026
e-Filing Number
01-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/26921/2026
Filing Date
01-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/13671/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Bench Type
Single
Category
18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALBIR AND ANR
Adv. VINEET CHAUDHARY
-
2.state of haryana and ors
-
3.mahabir
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
-
2.state of haryana and ors
-
3.mahabir
-
4.commissioner rohtak
-
5.assistant collector lst grade
-
6.satish
-
7.bhanti
-
8.sunil
-
9.anisha
-
10.paleram
-
11.raj alais raj singh
-
12.ramkuwar
-
13.raghubir
-
14.paleram
-
15.balwan
-
16.mamta
-
17.sanjeev
-
18.yashoda
-
19.shakuntla
-
20.jitender
-
21.mehar singh
-
22.chhoto
-
23.sarjo
-
24.savitri
-
25.billo
-
26.ramphal
-
27.sukhchain
-
28.mamkaur
-
29.giandai
-
30.anguri
-
31.harkesh
-
32.phulpati
-
33.dharma
-
34.ramphal
-
35.jai singh
-
36.jai singh
-
37.rampat
-
38.aumi
-
39.shakuntla
-
40.sheelo devi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition filed by Balbir and another seeking a stay on dispossession pending two revision petitions. Based on the State's assurance that the Financial Commissioner would consider the stay prayer by 25.05.2026 and pass an appropriate order within ten days thereafter, the court found no further order necessary and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/13671/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition filed by Balbir and another seeking a stay on dispossession pending two revision petitions. Based on the State's assurance that the Financial Commissioner would consider the stay prayer by 25.05.2026 and pass an appropriate order within ten days thereafter, the court found no further order necessary and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts