GHANSHYAM JAISWAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/25534/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010746262026

Filing Number

CRM-M/34691/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25534/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GHANSHYAM JAISWAL

    Adv. SARABPREET SINGH SANDHU

  2. 2.GHANSHYAM JAISWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.GHANSHYAM JAISWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Ghanshyam Jaiswal's second pre-arrest bail petition in FIR No. 315 (under BNS 2023 sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2)), holding it constitutes an abuse of process. The court found no material change in circumstances warranting reconsideration after the first petition was dismissed on 23.04.2026, and noted the petitioner withdrew the earlier petition strategically after the court appeared disinclined to grant bail. The petition was dismissed with ₹10,000 cost payable to the Bar Association Lawyer's Family Welfare Fund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25534/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Ghanshyam Jaiswal's second pre-arrest bail petition in FIR No. 315 (under BNS 2023 sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2)), holding it constitutes an abuse of process. The court found no material change in circumstances warranting reconsideration after the first petition was dismissed on 23.04.2026, and noted the petitioner withdrew the earlier petition strategically after the court appeared disinclined to grant bail. The petition was dismissed with ₹10,000 cost payable to the Bar Association Lawyer's Family Welfare Fund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case