KULDEEP SINGH vs MALKIAT SINGH & ANR — CRR/4058/2017

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010745322017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th November 2017

Filing Number

CRR/4058/2017

Filing Date

02-11-2017

Registration No

CRR/4058/2017

Registration Date

03-11-2017

Judge

MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT

Coram

MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT

Bench Type

Single

Category

37.35 - CRL REV AGNST CONV (GENERAL ONE YEAR) ( 617 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

KULDEEP SINGH

Adv. Sandeep Kumar Passi

Respondent(s)

MALKIAT SINGH & ANR

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT

06-11-2017
20-08-2018
19-03-2018
20-12-2017
27-11-2017

Orders

06-11-2017

MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH

27-11-2017

MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH

20-12-2017

MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH

19-03-2018

MR. JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI

20-08-2018

MR. JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI

15-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside Kuldeep Singh's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted him after the parties reached a settlement deed dated 20.11.2025 through court-mandated mediation. The court recognized that cheque dishonor offenses have a compensatory rather than purely punitive character and allowed compounding under Section 147 of the Act, waiving the 15% litigation costs given the petitioner's financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside Kuldeep Singh's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted him after the parties reached a settlement deed dated 20.11.2025 through court-mandated mediation. The court recognized that cheque dishonor offenses have a compensatory rather than purely punitive character and allowed compounding under Section 147 of the Act, waiving the 15% litigation costs given the petitioner's financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case