SANJEEV CHAHAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/13710/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010742322026

e-Filing Number

30-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/26712/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/13710/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.1 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) ( 705 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV CHAHAL

    Adv. PARMINDER SINGH

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Director General, Department of Transport, Haryana

  4. 4.General Manager Haryana Roadways,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    Summary Petitioner Sanjeev Chahal sought to quash his suspension order based on conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, arguing the conviction involved no moral turpitude and his sentence was already suspended with full restitution made. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal during arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13710/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Petitioner Sanjeev Chahal sought to quash his suspension order based on conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, arguing the conviction involved no moral turpitude and his sentence was already suspended with full restitution made. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal during arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case