ADITYA BIRLA HOUSING FINANCE LTD vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/13630/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010741952026

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/26673/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/13630/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADITYA BIRLA HOUSING FINANCE LTD

    Adv. NAKUL SHARMA

  2. 2.Aditya Birla Housing Finance Ltd

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Aditya Birla Housing Finance Ltd

  3. 3.Chier Judicial Magistrate

  4. 4.Malkeet Singh

  5. 5.Manjit Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    Case Summary: The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of Aditya Birla Housing Finance's writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapurthala to decide a pending Section 14 SARFAESI Act application. The court directed the magistrate to decide the application expeditiously within 60 days from order communication, unless legal impediments exist, citing precedent cases on timely disposal of SARFAESI applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13630/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of Aditya Birla Housing Finance's writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapurthala to decide a pending Section 14 SARFAESI Act application. The court directed the magistrate to decide the application expeditiously within 60 days from order communication, unless legal impediments exist, citing precedent cases on timely disposal of SARFAESI applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case