RAHUL vs THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY ACS FOR THE AGRICULTURE AND FARMER DEPARTMENT IN HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/13699/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010741872026
e-Filing Number
30-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/26683/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/13699/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal
Coram
Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal
Bench Type
Double
Category
8.4 - HUID HARYANA((HOUSING URBAN INDL. DEVELOPMENT) ( 405 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHUL
Adv. AJAY KUMAR DAHIYA
-
2.The additional chief Secretary ACS for the Agriculture and farmer Department in haryana and others
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY ACS FOR THE AGRICULTURE AND FARMER DEPARTMENT IN HARYANA AND OTHERS
-
2.The additional chief Secretary ACS for the Agriculture and farmer Department in haryana and others
-
3.The chief administrator haryana
-
4.Market committee
-
5.The Secretary market committee
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF
The court disposed of the writ petition by setting aside an impugned memo dated 30.03.2026, finding the matter substantially covered by a prior judgment in CWP-13172-2026. The court directed the competent authority to pass a fresh order after affording the petitioner a hearing, to be completed within four months from the order's communication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/13699/2026
The court disposed of the writ petition by setting aside an impugned memo dated 30.03.2026, finding the matter substantially covered by a prior judgment in CWP-13172-2026. The court directed the competent authority to pass a fresh order after affording the petitioner a hearing, to be completed within four months from the order's communication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts