KAMAL KISHORE LOHIA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/25203/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010741282026

Filing Number

CRM-M/34429/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25203/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Coram

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL KISHORE LOHIA

    Adv. S. K. AGNIHOTRI

  2. 2.KAMAL KISHORE LOHIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.KAMAL KISHORE LOHIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/25203/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Kamal Kishore Lohia's pre-arrest bail petition in a fraud case involving the Zooky Company investment scheme. Lohia, as Managing Director and promoter, allegedly lured investors including Sandeep Kumar with promises to double their investments within 33 months through clothes and food outlets, but defrauded them of substantial amounts (totaling Rs. 39.25 lakhs outstanding). The court found Lohia's active participation in company meetings, promotion using BSF uniform photographs, and personal assurances to victims warranted custodial interrogation to recover company records and invested funds, rejecting his claims that co-accused Krishna alone masterminded the scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25203/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/25203/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Kamal Kishore Lohia's pre-arrest bail petition in a fraud case involving the Zooky Company investment scheme. Lohia, as Managing Director and promoter, allegedly lured investors including Sandeep Kumar with promises to double their investments within 33 months through clothes and food outlets, but defrauded them of substantial amounts (totaling Rs. 39.25 lakhs outstanding). The court found Lohia's active participation in company meetings, promotion using BSF uniform photographs, and personal assurances to victims warranted custodial interrogation to recover company records and invested funds, rejecting his claims that co-accused Krishna alone masterminded the scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case