SATYBIR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/13581/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section Article 226 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010740012026

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/26597/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/13581/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.1 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) ( 705 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section Article 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYBIR SINGH

    Adv. MUKESH YADAV

  2. 2.Satybir Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Satybir Singh

  3. 3.Director department of woman

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Director of the Department of Women and Child Development, Haryana, to consider and decide a legal notice dated 02.03.2026 regarding the petitioner's promotion to the post of Assistant with retrospective effect (matching juniors' promotion dates). The court mandated a reasoned speaking order within eight weeks after providing the petitioner a hearing opportunity, without adjudicating the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13581/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Director of the Department of Women and Child Development, Haryana, to consider and decide a legal notice dated 02.03.2026 regarding the petitioner's promotion to the post of Assistant with retrospective effect (matching juniors' promotion dates). The court mandated a reasoned speaking order within eight weeks after providing the petitioner a hearing opportunity, without adjudicating the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case