ABHISHEK vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/24919/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010736292026

Filing Number

CRM-M/34153/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/24919/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK

    Adv. TUSHAR GAUTAM

  2. 2.ABHISHEK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.ABHISHEK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    CRM-M-24919-2026 Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Abhishek in a fraud case involving false employment promises and electricity bill reduction schemes (FIR No.70 dated 22.05.2025). The court found that evidence was largely documentary with no direct evidence linking the petitioner, no recovery to be effected, and accepted his compliance with investigation orders. The interim bail granted on 04.05.2026 was made absolute on 14.05.2026 after the State confirmed the petitioner had fully cooperated with investigations and was no longer required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/24919/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CRM-M-24919-2026 Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Abhishek in a fraud case involving false employment promises and electricity bill reduction schemes (FIR No.70 dated 22.05.2025). The court found that evidence was largely documentary with no direct evidence linking the petitioner, no recovery to be effected, and accepted his compliance with investigation orders. The interim bail granted on 04.05.2026 was made absolute on 14.05.2026 after the State confirmed the petitioner had fully cooperated with investigations and was no longer required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case