SANDEEP PANJETA @ SANDEEP KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/24553/2026
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010735132026
Filing Number
CRM-M/34116/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/24553/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel
Coram
Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANDEEP PANJETA @ SANDEEP KUMAR
Adv. Kiran Pal Singh
-
2.SANDEEP PANJETA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA
-
2.SANDEEP PANJETA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M/24553/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Sandeep Panjeta's anticipatory bail petition on May 13, 2026. Justice Sumeet Goel found serious allegations against the petitioner, including threatening a complainant over a ₹45 lakh land transaction that allegedly drove the complainant to consume poison, resulting in his death. The court rejected bail, holding that custodial interrogation was necessary for investigation and that no plausible cause for false implication existed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/24553/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M/24553/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Sandeep Panjeta's anticipatory bail petition on May 13, 2026. Justice Sumeet Goel found serious allegations against the petitioner, including threatening a complainant over a ₹45 lakh land transaction that allegedly drove the complainant to consume poison, resulting in his death. The court rejected bail, holding that custodial interrogation was necessary for investigation and that no plausible cause for false implication existed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts