OM PARKASH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CWP/14470/2020

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Sep-2020

CNR: PHHC010731482020

Filing Number

CWP/32898/2020

Filing Date

11-Sep-2020

Registration No

CWP/14470/2020

Registration Date

14-Sep-2020

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.21 - SERVICE-HARYANA POLICE ( 713 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OM PARKASH

    Adv. SURESH KUMAR REDHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE HARYANA

  3. 3.ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ROHTAK RANGE

  4. 4.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CHARKHI DADRI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh NalwaView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Om Parkash's writ petition challenging his compulsory retirement order dated July 13, 2020, as infructuous. Since the petitioner retired after attaining superannuation age during the pendency of the petition (while the order's operation was kept in abeyance by an earlier court order), the court found the petition no longer capable of grant of relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Sep-2020

    Other

  4. 11-Sep-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14470/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Om Parkash's writ petition challenging his compulsory retirement order dated July 13, 2020, as infructuous. Since the petitioner retired after attaining superannuation age during the pendency of the petition (while the order's operation was kept in abeyance by an earlier court order), the court found the petition no longer capable of grant of relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case