DINESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/25741/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010731122026

Filing Number

CRM-M/33940/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25741/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER

    Adv. AASHISH BHAGAT

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.PANKAJ KAPOOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners (Dinesh Kumar and another) in an FIR registered under Sections 406, 420, and 120-B IPC at Police Station Tripri, Patiala. The court made the interim bail order absolute after the petitioners complied with the previous order dated 07.05.2026 by joining the investigation to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer, who confirmed they were no longer required for further investigation. The petitioners must continue joining investigations as required and comply with conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25741/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners (Dinesh Kumar and another) in an FIR registered under Sections 406, 420, and 120-B IPC at Police Station Tripri, Patiala. The court made the interim bail order absolute after the petitioners complied with the previous order dated 07.05.2026 by joining the investigation to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer, who confirmed they were no longer required for further investigation. The petitioners must continue joining investigations as required and comply with conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case