MAHENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/13580/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 and 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010729332026

e-Filing Number

28-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/26152/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/13580/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.1 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) ( 705 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 and 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDER SINGH

    Adv. DALEL SINGH NAIN

  2. 2.The State of Haryana and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.The State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.The Director General

  4. 4.The Director General

  5. 5.The District Ayurvedic Officer

  6. 6.The Ayurvedic Medical Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Mahender Singh's petition for service regularization by directing the Director General, Department of AYUSH, to reconsider his case afresh within six weeks against the 2014 Haryana regularization policy for Group C/D employees with 3+ years of service. The court deferred substantive adjudication, leaving the eligibility determination to the administrative authority based on established policy criteria and principles from related precedent cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13580/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Mahender Singh's petition for service regularization by directing the Director General, Department of AYUSH, to reconsider his case afresh within six weeks against the 2014 Haryana regularization policy for Group C/D employees with 3+ years of service. The court deferred substantive adjudication, leaving the eligibility determination to the administrative authority based on established policy criteria and principles from related precedent cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case