SUNIL SATIJA & ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA & ANR — CRM-M/8474/2018
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010726292018
Next Hearing
28th February 2018
Filing Number
CRM-M/8474/2018
Filing Date
26-02-2018
Registration No
CRM-M/8474/2018
Registration Date
26-02-2018
Judge
MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Coram
MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Bench Type
Single
Category
38.1 - QUASHING PETITIONS I/O ( 152 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNIL SATIJA & ANR
Adv. GAUTAM DUTT
Respondent(s)
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-02-2018 | |
| 26-11-2018 | |
| 21-08-2018 | |
| 28-05-2018 | |
| 16-04-2018 |
Orders
MR. JUSTICE HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN
MR. JUSTICE HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN
MR. JUSTICE HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN
MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Case Summary: CRM-M/8474/2018 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed a criminal complaint against Sunil Satija and another (accused in a real estate fraud case involving alleged price manipulation and document forgery) based on a settlement agreement executed between the parties. The complainant alleged the accused altered apartment pricing from Rs.5,345/- to Rs.5,710/- per sq. ft. and fabricated documents to demand additional payments totaling Rs.15,70,108/-. However, the court allowed the petition after the accused settled the dispute by paying Rs.46,00,000/- and the complainant agreed to withdraw all proceedings. The court found this a civil-flavored commercial dispute where continuation would be wasteful, imposing only a nominal cost of Rs.75,000/- to a medical welfare fund as a condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRM-M/8474/2018 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed a criminal complaint against Sunil Satija and another (accused in a real estate fraud case involving alleged price manipulation and document forgery) based on a settlement agreement executed between the parties. The complainant alleged the accused altered apartment pricing from Rs.5,345/- to Rs.5,710/- per sq. ft. and fabricated documents to demand additional payments totaling Rs.15,70,108/-. However, the court allowed the petition after the accused settled the dispute by paying Rs.46,00,000/- and the complainant agreed to withdraw all proceedings. The court found this a civil-flavored commercial dispute where continuation would be wasteful, imposing only a nominal cost of Rs.75,000/- to a medical welfare fund as a condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts