RAVINDER AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/13484/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010724962026

e-Filing Number

28-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/26040/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/13484/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.1 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) ( 705 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDER AND OTHERS

    Adv. RAHIL MAHAJAN

  2. 2.Ravinder and Others

  3. 3.Director General

  4. 4.Surender

  5. 5.Sandeep

  6. 6.Devender Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Ravinder and Others

  3. 3.Director General

  4. 4.Surender

  5. 5.Sandeep

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Director General, Transport Department, Chandigarh to consider and decide a legal notice dated 30.03.2026 within eight weeks, after providing the petitioners an opportunity of hearing, by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The petition sought a mandamus for notional benefits at par with petitioners from an earlier case (CWP 18044/2014), relying on prior court directions and judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13484/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Director General, Transport Department, Chandigarh to consider and decide a legal notice dated 30.03.2026 within eight weeks, after providing the petitioners an opportunity of hearing, by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The petition sought a mandamus for notional benefits at par with petitioners from an earlier case (CWP 18044/2014), relying on prior court directions and judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case